According to a report in the New York
Times, Washington counts all military-age males in a drone strike zone as
combatants, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them
innocent.
Now consider that in conjunction with the Administration's
recent memo which said that any SUSPECTED American in collusion with terrorists
could be killed by the government!
That means that if you are killed, you're guilty. Period, done deal. UNLESS after you're killed, it can be PROVEN
that you were innocent, in which case you are determined to be innocent -- but
dead.
Not unlike the Salem witch trials, where they weighted down
and submerged the accused witch. If she manifested
some super power, blew up the dunking device, overcame the guards and survived the
submerging, she was guilty and then was killed.
If she did NOT survive the submerging, she was innocent of witchcraft…
but was unfortunately deceased.
The super-powered derailing of the dunking test – that never
happened.
POSTHUMOUSLY? REALLY?
ONLY THEN are they counted as a civilian casualty rather
than the death of a military person during a wartime engagement? Fat lot of good (as they say) that does them.
Suddenly where the Florida "Last Man Standing" law
came from, is beginning to make sense to me...
Catch 22 is alive and well and as obfuscating and skewed to
the benefit of bizarre government behavior as it has ever been.
I guess History really IS written by the winners and
survivors. The dead are either a)
witches, b) not witches, c) American citizens who are terrorists, or d)
American citizens who are not terrorists; but the United States of America has
decided to ‘kill ‘em all and let God sort ‘em out.’
No comments:
Post a Comment