TAP DANCING IN RESPONSE TO THE GUN PROLIFERATION PROBLEM IN OUR COUNTRY TODAY AND TO THE STRANGLEHOLD THAT THE NRA HAS ON CONGRESS:
Predictably, in the aftermath of a shooting like that in
Newtown, the gun ownership advocates are decrying that it’s too soon to discuss
gun control legislation. The gun control advocates are decrying what they
perceive as foot dragging and asking if not now, then when?
One big difference that I have noticed in the aftermath discourse
this time that hasn’t been as prevalent as before is the discussion for the
need for a second prong to prevention; that of mental health care or screening.
Sad to say, however, there are two problems with this.
One, it’s as if no one has noticed before that those who
perpetrate such horrific violence are likely mentally ill. Why hasn’t this issue been raised to the
fever pitch previously that it has this time? Why are we glib about comprehensive health care coverage until that lack is made salient by such a tragedy?
Well, I fear I know the answer, and it's the second of the two problems. It’s that the gun ‘rights’ advocates are
throwing us a red herring: "We refuse to
discuss slowing the insane proliferation of guns, unless you can offer some
solution to how we deal with the mental health issues of mass murderers." The NRAers have grasped firmly this next
logical manifestation of ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’ and have
turned it into ‘we won’t discuss the ungodly number and use of guns in this
country, until you can adequately predict who has the potential to be a mass
murderer.’
They are willing to dig in their heels at gun control and
now – after the national outrage over the deaths of so many children – have developed
a new delaying tactic: you must be able to predict who is going to be the next person
to flip out and commit such a heinous act?
Well I can. It’s
going to be the one who CAN. Whatever else
you may be able to say about the next shooter of such tragic proportions: they
will be a shooter. The fact that we hand
every Tom, Dick and Harry the means to use easily available automatic weapons
on school children speaks to a baseline similarity across all of the
shooters. Yeah. Of course.
They are shooters.
We can tap dance around another rationalization,
justification and delaying tactic for meaningful examination of gun regulation
and control. And it’s not just timing
that the NRA proponents will invoke this time.
It's not just, 'wait a respectful amount of time before you talk about gun control.' It’s a blink-first showdown and the right has recently demonstrated that
they are quite good at manhandling and bullying the country on these showdowns.
This one will be simply: unless and until you can cure mental
illness and/or predict who will become a violent mass murderer, we’ll use that
as an excuse for not agreeing to discuss reasonable gun control.
Perhaps in time for the next school mass killing, they’ll
have come up with an excuse as clever and as distracting as this tap dance.
An excellent discussion. And the answer, of course, to "Guns don't kill people--PEOPLE kill people" is, "Yes--people WITH GUNS kill people. It's really hard to kill somebody with a pea shooter. So it's time to get rid of the guns and replace them with pea-shooters. Or else admit that killing is really what you, the NRA, are advocating, and always have been advocating."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/nra-responds-sandy-hook_n_2325059.html
ReplyDeleteThe NRA will, on Friday, offer something 'meaningful' - whatever that means. I will wait for Friday before commenting. (unless the Mayans are right - then all bets are off)